The Three States of Mind in Marriage
How One Spouse Can Lead
the other Back to Intimacy
Marriage partners do not necessarily experience the same state of mind in marriage at the same time.
One spouse may disrupt the other's state of Intimacy by failing to meet an emotional need, or
inadvertant thoughtlessness. In the state of Conflict, the offended spouse begins to complain, nag,
and may even try to start a fight. As the complaints escalate, the other spouse who has been in the state
of Intimacy, is dragged into the state of Conflict as well, and then the fighting begins in earnest.
Typically, if they fail in their efforts to resolve the conflict, and if the unpleasant effects escalate, one
spouse will go into Withdrawal first and raise his or her emotional barriers. The spouse that remains
in the state of Conflict continues to argue, while the withdrawn spouse tries to escape. If the arguing
spouse persists, the withdrawn spouse may be goaded to re-enter the Conflict state, and fight back.
Or, the arguing spouse may give up and enter the Withdrawal state, too.
One spouse may also lead the other on the road back from Withdrawal to Conflict and eventually to
back to Intimacy. In Withdrawal, a husband may decide to make a new effort to restore Intimacy
and toss out an olive branch. That effort places him back into the Conflict state, while his wife is still
Suppose his effort is an encouragement to her and she eventually joins him in the state of Conflict.
Now they are both willing to have their needs met by the other, but their Takers encourage them to
fight about it, rather than negotiate intelligently and peacefully. In all too many cases, if they follow
their Taker's advice and argue rather than negotiate, they both find themselves back in the state of
Withdrawal, convinced that in that state their marriage is safer, and certainly more peaceful.
But this step from Withdrawal to Conflict is a step in the right direction, and provides spouses an
opportunity to regain Intimacy -- if they can resist the advice of their Takers. Withdrawal may seem
more peaceful, but it is actually a shuttering down of the marriage. A return to the state of Conflict is
a sign that the partners have restored hope -- the marriage is worth fighting over. By coming out of
Withdrawal, they are lowering their emotional defenses and taking the risk of getting close to each
While demanding and arguing is instinctive in the state of Conflict, one spouse can lead the other
back to Intimacy by resisting the Taker's temptation to fight. It takes two to argue, and if one
spouse makes an effort to avoid making demands and judgmental statements, and tries to be
thoughtful and meet the other's needs, the other spouse usually calms down and does the same
Once they see each other's caring efforts, and rebuild their Love Bank accounts, they re-enter the
Intimacy stage. But there's an irony that trips up some couples. Which spouse do you think is the first
to move back into the state of Intimacy: the one who makes the first effort to meet the other's needs,
or the recipient of that effort? You may have guessed it. The recipient of care is usually the first to
return to the state of intimacy, and not the one who make the greatest effort to save the relationship.
If you set a good example by meeting your spouse's needs first, alas, that usually means that your
own needs are met last. Your Taker is not pleased with this arrangement, and may try to sabotage it.
You will need to make a deliberate and patient effort to override the Taker's instinct to retreat back
to fighting and name-calling. But if you resist that instinct to argue, and instead focus attention on
behaving thoughtfully and meeting your spouse's needs, your spouse will be encouraged to
Granted, when in the state of Conflict, it's much more difficult to be thoughtful and meet each other's
emotional needs. That's because the Taker's advice dominates the Giver's advice, and the Taker
isn't interested in thoughtfulness or meeting someone else's needs. So if you want to return to
Intimacy, you must override this instinct with great effort. Meeting an emotional need in marriage is
easy when you are in the state of Intimacy, because the Giver encourages you to do just that. But in
the state of Confict, it seems very unnatural and even unfair.
When your Love Bank balances are finally restored, and your love for each other is triggered again,
the struggle is over. You will have returned to Intimacy, and along with it, everything you need to do
for each other will seem almost effortless.
The passage from Intimacy, through Conflict, to Withdrawal is a slippery slope. You can get there
before you know it. But it takes quite a bit of work to climb back up that hill. While one of you can
help by pulling the other back up the hill, it's a lot easier when you both work together. And the best
way to work yourselves back to Intimacy from Withdrawal and Conflict is by negotiating effectively.
My next concept is designed to helps you negotiate in all three states of mind in marriage, when your insticts tell you to either give or take or even give up entirely. It's a rule that I want you use as a way to override the short-sighted advice of
both your Giver and Taker. I call the rule the Policy of Joint Agreement.
The Policy of Joint Agreement